Multi-Source Reasoning - Dichotomous
Incorrect.
[[snippet]]
The last sentence containing instructions asks the job applicant to include your availability (part time or full time). Therefore, both part-time and full-time applicants can be considered for the position.
Correct!
[[snippet]]
Since the last sentence asks job applicants to indicate whether they are available full time or part time, it can be inferred that both types of applicants are being considered.
Correct!
[[snippet]]
Although there is no indication here about training, this can be inferred based on the fact that candidates with some knowledge of Vanars are a big plus. That implies that some level of specialized knowledge will be required to do this job, and since it is not essential to have prior knowledge, those without it will have to be trained.
Incorrect!
[[snippet]]
You might choose this answer because the job posting does not specifically refer to job training, but the fact that candidates with some knowledge of Vanars are a big plus indicates that some degree of specialized knowledge is necessary to perform this role, so it can be assumed that training will take place.
Correct!
[[snippet]]
While the ability to work well with others listed under the qualities of a successful applicant indicates that teamwork will be part of the role, there is no indication that this will take up the majority of the work in this role.
Incorrect.
[[snippet]]
This is a tempting choice because among the qualifications for the job is the ability to work well with others. However, that does not necessarily imply that working with others constitutes the majority of the work in this role.
