Don’t lose your progress!

We cover every section of the GMAT with in-depth lessons, 5000+ practice questions and realistic practice tests.

Up to 90+ points GMAT score improvement guarantee

The best guarantee you’ll find

Our Premium and Ultimate plans guarantee up to 90+ points score increase or your money back.

Master each section of the test

Comprehensive GMAT prep

We cover every section of the GMAT with in-depth lessons, 5000+ practice questions and realistic practice tests.

Schedule-free studying

Learn on the go

Study whenever and wherever you want with our iOS and Android mobile apps.

The most effective way to study

Personalized GMAT prep, just for you!

Adaptive learning technology focuses on your academic weaknesses.

Reading Comprehension: Inference Questions

What may be inferred about other armies during Napoleon's time from the tactics Napoleon used to fight against them?

That's right!


Since we know that, without communications or supply lines, the enemy armies were put at a disadvantage, we therefore know that they relied on these items, i.e. they were not self sufficient.



The passage gives us no information regarding the structure of Napoleon's armies, so we cannot make any comparisons.



Although the second paragraph only describes Napoleon's victories, we cannot say for certain that he was never defeated. There simply isn't enough information in the passage to make this inference.



The passage mentions neither Napoleon's nor his enemy's weaponry and therefore we cannot infer that one was better than the other.



This answer choice goes too far. We may only infer that the generals of the opposing armies did not think like Napoleon. This does not mean that they were not resourceful and creative in their own right.

They lacked resourceful and creative generals.
Their weaponry was not as effective as that of Napoleon.
They never defeated Napoleon.
They were not self sufficient.
They were no different in structure from Napoleon's armies.