Don’t lose your progress!

We cover every section of the GMAT with in-depth lessons, 5000+ practice questions and realistic practice tests.

Up to 90+ points GMAT score improvement guarantee

The best guarantee you’ll find

Our Premium and Ultimate plans guarantee up to 90+ points score increase or your money back.

Master each section of the test

Comprehensive GMAT prep

We cover every section of the GMAT with in-depth lessons, 5000+ practice questions and realistic practice tests.

Schedule-free studying

Learn on the go

Study whenever and wherever you want with our iOS and Android mobile apps.

The most effective way to study

Personalized GMAT prep, just for you!

Adaptive learning technology focuses on your academic weaknesses.

Reading Comprehension: Structure Questions

What is the purpose of the second paragraph in relation to the passage as a whole?

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

The first paragraph does mention religion when it says that existentialists deny the existence of an omnipotent higher power. Furthermore, religion is not a facet of existentialism; it is an external concept to which existentialism relates in various ways.

Good job!

[[snippet]]

The first paragraph tells us that existentialism does not believe in an omnipotent higher power. The second paragraph shows us how this belief fits in with the existential view of God.

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

This answer choice suggests that there are some existentialists who believe that God is omnipotent (all-powerful). However, although we know that theistic existentialists believe in God, there is nothing in the second paragraph to suggest that they argue for the idea that God is all-powerful. For instance, the passage states that theistic existentialists believe that humans, not God, have the power to control their own destiny. Therefore, if God lacks this power, God cannot be all-powerful in this view.

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

We know from the first sentence of the second paragraph that although it might seem that the fundamental tenets of existentialism preclude, or rule out, the existence of God, this is not necessarily the case. That is, the author does not see existentialism and theism as incompatible.

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

The religious thoughts of Nietzsche and Kierkegaard are not discussed in either the first or second paragraph.

The second paragraph provides details about the religious thoughts of Nietzsche and Kierkegaard mentioned in the first paragraph.
The second paragraph emphasizes the incompatibility between existentialist philosophy and theistic belief.
The second paragraph challenges the contention made in the first paragraph that all existentialists deny the existence of an all-powerful God.
The second paragraph expands on existentialist views about God, as suggested by the first paragraph.
The second paragraph discusses a facet of existentialism, religion, which is not mentioned in the first paragraph.