We cover every section of the GMAT with in-depth lessons, 5000+ practice questions and realistic practice tests.

## Up to 90+ points GMAT score improvement guarantee

### The best guarantee you’ll find

Our Premium and Ultimate plans guarantee up to 90+ points score increase or your money back.

## Master each section of the test

### Comprehensive GMAT prep

We cover every section of the GMAT with in-depth lessons, 5000+ practice questions and realistic practice tests.

## Schedule-free studying

### Learn on the go

Study whenever and wherever you want with our iOS and Android mobile apps.

## The most effective way to study

### Personalized GMAT prep, just for you!

Contrary to a former estimation made by the head of the tourism industry of Country X, there was no rise in the number of tourists or in the average sum of money spent by each tourist in the past year. There was, however, a steep increase of almost 20 percent in profits from the tourist industry in that time span.

Which of the following statements, if true, help to explain the rise in profits?

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

This answer choice would have been correct if we hadn't known that the average revenues remained the same.

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

We know from the first sentence that the estimates for last year's tourist industry were wrong (there was no rise).

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

We know that the amount of tourists which actually entered Country X remained the same, so the fact that it was easier for tourists to enter the country had no influence over the overall profits of the industry.

Incorrect.

[[snippet]]

If the employers had to take more money out of their pockets, the expenses in the industry would rise and the profits would drop. This answer choice does not resolve the paradox, it emphasizes it.