Our Premium and Ultimate plans guarantee up to 90+ points score increase or your money back.
We cover every section of the GMAT with in-depth lessons, 5000+ practice questions and realistic practice tests.
Study whenever and wherever you want with our iOS and Android mobile apps.
Adaptive learning technology focuses on your academic weaknesses.
Water reaches its freezing point at 32 degrees Fahrenheit. Below this level it is solid, whereas above it is liquid. Water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit.
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?
We are told nothing of the effect of salt on water. New premises are not acceptable answers to inference questions. Remember, we are looking for a conclusion, not a premise.
Though boiling is indeed a form of evaporation, to conclude that water starts evaporating long before then is a leap. Remember, we are looking for a small step forward.
We are told nothing of liquids as energy sources. In GMAT logic, this is still too much of a leap. Remember: one small step is all you need.
We are told nothing of the relation between the temperature of water above 212 degrees Fahrenheit and the time it takes to evaporate. This answer choice takes too far a leap from what is given in the premises.
Aye aye, Sir![[snippet]]
If water is solid below 32 degrees Fahrenheit (Premise B) and above that point it is liquid (Premise C), boats' captains must check that the temperature isn't below 32 degrees Fahrenheit or their boats will get stuck.